‹ Back to search

General

Success and Luck

good fortune and the myth of meritocracy

The subtitle of 'good fortune and the myth of meritocracy' conveys the substance of the argument in this stimulating book. Perhaps the most dramatic example in the author's life, although there are others, is his sudden cardiac arrest while playing tennis and the fact that ambulance came so quickly when the average was around 15 minutes. The author arguably creates too great a dichotomy between success and luck in order to make the important point that talented and hard-working people do not always succeed and that advantages or disadvantages of birth may be decisive. What is missing is the dynamic between inner and outer represented by synchronicity and also illustrated in Pasteur's maxim that chance favours the prepared mind – we have to be in a position to take advantage of opportunities. The author shows how winner-takes-all markets magnify the role of luck and that the biggest winners are almost always lucky, like Bill Gates. Successful people will be inclined to attribute more of their success to hard work and talent than luck, which may be a misapprehension and a rationalisation that they deserve the large amount of money associated with their success. The author reports on a fascinating experiment where the emphasis of a success narrative is subtly shifted by final paragraph stressing either hard work or luck - students are more likely to think the author kind and friendly if they admit role of luck. Curiously, the author also makes an interesting case for a progressive consumption rather than income tax, which is only tangentially related to the main theme of the book through inequality. In any event, it makes for an engaging reflection.