Science Philosophy of Science
Newton's Apple and Other Myths about Science
Although the blurb uses the strong word 'debunking' this book is in fact more about setting the record straight by correcting misrepresentations and misconceptions about the nature of science and its history – its strengths and limitations. There are 27 myths, arranged chronologically, with some general considerations at the end. I was rather amazed to find that the book is dedicated to the geologist Nicolaas Rupke, whom I met more than 25 years ago and have not seen for at least 20. The titles are provocative and intriguing, and writers explain how the myth came about as well as how it was perpetuated; they are all preceded by that: for instance, that alchemy and astrology were superstitious pursuits that did not contribute to science and scientific understanding. Given such statements, readers naturally wish to know more. There are issues from astronomy, geography, physics, biology and philosophy of science. Many 19th century essays are related to the work of Darwin, but also mention Lamarck, Wallace, Mendel and Pasteur. Michael Ruse discusses directly the theories of Darwin and Wallace. Two of the essays in the final section explore whether religion has really impeded the progress of science, as proposed by proponents of the conflict hypothesis, and the popular understanding of science in relation to what scientists actually do. Although written by specialists, these essays can be recommended to any reader interested in the history of science.