‹ Back to search

Futures Studies Economics Ecology

Reclaiming Food Security

Food security has been much in the news recently, which makes this radical reassessment of the concept all the more timely. Carolan questions current assumptions, especially the agro-industrial and food systems based on providing the cheapest calories possible, with devastating effects on the environment, small holders and health. He argues that a secure food system enables people both present and future to prosper and lead long, happy and healthy lives. In discussing the history of food security, he identifies the most important factors as what he calls the calorie-isation, neo-liberalisation and empty calorie-isation of the concept. The US, where much of this thinking originated, can hardly be held up as an exemplar in terms of obesity, food waste and subjective well-being.

In the second part, the author identifies the missing pieces as well being and nutrition, sustainability, and food sovereignty, safety and access. Just at the time of the green revolution between 1950 and 1970, it is interesting to learn that low income nations went from being entirely food self-sufficient to accounting for almost half of the world's grain imports. In the light of neoliberal trade policy based on comparative advantage, this is thought to be a good thing, but it creates dependency on a massive scale as well as depopulating the countryside with all its attendant social implications. Carolan's analysis makes clear how unsustainable agro-industrial models are in the longer term, but all governments seem to support this kind of future and the science that drives it, powered by immensely influential lobbies. It is these developments that have produced unprecedented concentration in the food industry, resulting not only in monopoly power but also what the author calls monopsony, the corresponding power of large buyers. He creates his own Food and Human Security Index (FHSI) with five indicators: individual and societal well-being, ecological sustainability, potential for food independence, nutritional well-being, and freedom in agri-food chain. He calculates the score for 126 countries, with Costa Rica at the top and the US at 55. It is an eye-opening chart and recontextualises the debate away from the quantitative towards the qualitative. The reader is left realising that food sovereignty is perhaps just as important as food security.